Shao Weizhong’s “Lecture Notes for the Fourth Four-Pillar Special Training Class” PDF e-book download. Content Abstract Regarding the basic theories and methods of the Four-Pillar Forecasting, I have discussed in detail in “Analysis of Four-Pillar Forecasting Example Questions”. middle. Today we will repeat this question again. The reason for this

Shao Weizhong’s “Lecture Notes of the Fourth Four-Pillar Special Training Class” PDF e-book download.

Content Summary

I have discussed the basic theories and methods of the Four-Pillar Forecast in “Anatomy of the Four-Pillar Forecast Examples” in detail. A Compilation of Prediction Questions and Answers – Book 1. Today we will repeat this question again. The reason for doing this is to emphasize the importance of basic theory learning. Because of the four-pillar forecasting, only by memorizing the basic theory well can you not go astray, avoid detours, and go to the practical stage as soon as possible: I have established the basic theory and method of the four-pillar forecasting on the basis of the principle of the five elements. of. Its core lies in expounding the relationship between the heavenly stems and the earthly branches, and between the earthly branches and the earthly branches. He also clearly pointed out that when using the Four Pillars to make fortune-telling predictions, the Heavenly Stems and Five Elements talk about “restraining life”, and the Earthly Branches and Five Elements talk about “punishment, impact and harm”. The heavenly stem and the earthly branch, and between the earthly branch and the earthly branch, cannot directly talk about the birth and restraint of each other. After this point of view was put forward, it aroused different reactions among readers and students. One kind of attitude is warmly appreciating, positively accepting it, and applying it in practice; …the other kind of attitude is opposing, and puts forward the theory that the heavenly stems and earthly branches directly produce restraint; and some people hold a neutral attitude, thinking that both points are reasonable , take both. In this regard, I think it is a normal phenomenon. Because as an academic discussion, people should be allowed to have a process of cognition, practice and acceptance, and at the same time, different viewpoints should be allowed to exist. Only in this way can everyone distinguish between right and wrong, distinguish between true and false, understand the truth, and draw a correct conclusion.

Some screenshots